A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier as well as Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result parts are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they ended up meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key minute during the legal timeline.
With the Main of your dispute is actually a disagreement about boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as produced, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about guaranteeing that enhancement Irish Times article about René Collier at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing connection to the world as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply just trying to produce a family members property in accordance While using the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Region of Conservation and say that all is effective happen to be performed dependant on Qualified advice and authorised options. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean during a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around building of wall at coastal web site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming far more contentious.
The Irish Moments article about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded via midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the physical truth of the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing ailments. Yet the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell together with one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.