A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, seek out to build their relatives house. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized people. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming made by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence on the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Moments described, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these actions ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second while in the authorized timeline.
On the Main in the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as built, goes outside of what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, continues to be called meticulous in his examination of organizing files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing relationship to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only looking to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed according to Qualified advice and accepted programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering The ocean during a storm, don't alter the underlying specifics.
The situation has also René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web-site is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.